Now the problem with solicitors is finding one who is truly professional. By that I mean not partaking of the same golf club and holiday resort as your social service or police opponents. I do not of course infer any inappropriate meaning in this, but only serve it up as a reason to be careful. You could find that recommendation has a lot going for it, or through business you are already in contact with a good firm.
I would stress that when we explained to our first solicitor our problem, then went to meet the social service workers, because the SS knew who our solicitor was, they had been talking! I found this a gross violation of confidence and changed solicitors because of it.

Never forget that the solicitor is not facing jail, he only gives your case to the barrister anyway, however he (or she) will have laid out the groundwork for the barrister to take over and expand the various defences and options available to you to defend yourself. Look at the solicitor as the collector of information and the barrister as the focus for that information to be delivered. Both are essential players in your camp and your choice is unfortunately a lottery, unless you have friends who recommend a good one. Good as in obtaining as much expert advice as is needed, without you having to ask!

A major point to look for when dealing with solicitors is there advice in the first few meetings, if they seem vague and detached, they are thinking of other problems and therefore why should your case be high on their list in the future. Also if you are using the state to pay for your defence, keep in mind that you stand less chance of expert help, as the state is reluctant to fork out for any.

I have always asked myself if the state would aid me to fight it!
Sounds a bit silly, but why should it be fighting your corner when it would dearly like to see everyone arrested, inside! Again, that paranoid feeling comes creeping back in.